|
Nov
10 |
Topic: No Tags
Scrum-But, Scrummerfall, other fizzled Agile transitions… Goldratt describes these things (not directly), and similar phenomenon (like failure of companies to get the real benefits from ERP, SAP, 6Sig, Lean, etc.) nicely:
Specifically, Agile, as a technology improvement, removes limitations such as:
Make the Change Stick
Examples of Rules that May Need Changing and/or Scrapping in Agile Transitions
All of these rules that were made when older limitations existed, if they continue to be modus operandi, will sap away the ability to continuously improve and embody the change you are trying to make, leech away energy from your change agents, and eventually result in a transition that has been mediocre at best. It is exactly this situation that makes it appealing to create a hybrid method – such as combining the UP with Agile. Changing the rules – A transformation enabler I do believe that there are other aspects of Agile transitions that are important to consider. Changing the rules is a major one that is often neglected due to how difficult it is. Any time you feel like customizing your agile process with something from your former processes, ask yourself if it is because you have found a rule that needs changing! ![]()
|
||||||



